Lanval wrote:
gosh darn it, prove it! Cite examples and proof! Show a clear trail of evidence leading to a near-irrefutable conclusion.
Mike, I do not think anyone can PROVE beyond doubt with evidence their way, you ask an impossibility, no one on here can prove their way is best.
You and others prove your side first, then I will see if I can prove mine. You can't ask me to do something you yourself have not done.
If I was to attempt to, I would show the interpretation I think has been violated, we would disagree on that, and the next and the next. I think it is interesting you in a later post mention the very same thing about interpretation of the constitution.
Be careful posting multiplies after I replied and said it was late here, and wouldn't be able to reply further, you might be found guilty of what Turk does.
BTW, do not be too proud of what you learned in history, it is well know that the victors of war write the history, what you learn in school is not the total history, can you prove it is?
Here is something I was thinking of posting yesterday.
I, Steve says things are so messed up, we are not in control, we need major corrections in the system. And then,
Others say,We the people are in charge, we vote in the politicians.
Steve: How come what the people want isn't what is happening, drug laws, wars, the detainees?
Others, there are others that know more, that is why they didn't do what we want.
Steve: Then we don't have a government that does what we want, we need to change it.
Others, We the people are in charge, we vote in the politicians.
Steve: How come what the people want isn't what is happening, drug laws, wars, the detainees?
Others, there are others that know more, that is why they didn't do what we want.
Steve: Then we don't have a government that does what we want, we need to change it.
Others, We the people are in charge, we vote in the politicians.
Steve: How come what the people want isn't what is happening, drug laws, wars, the detainees?
Others, there are others that know more, that is why they didn't do what we want.
Steve: Then we don't have a government that does what we want, we need to change it.
Others, We the people are in charge, we vote in the politicians.
Steve: How come what the people want isn't what is happening, drug laws, wars, the detainees?
Others, there are others that know more, that is why they didn't do what we want.
Steve: Then we don't have a government that does what we want, we need to change it.
Others, We the people are in charge, we vote in the politicians.
Do you see why I am not getting convinced?
Why not take the time to say why what FDR and his son in law said is of no value? Some on here will say no biggie, they know the CFR is behind the scenes, and they agree and like that. Either way, why don't you comment on that? You may look up his son in law and say, there are 5 people who say he just hated his father in law and lied, that is a possibility I know could be.
As far as your post about Fl hurricanes, a total waste of time. That ASSUMES only your way could have taking care of things. Wow, look at you now, you seem to think your way is superior, that the ONLY way FL could have survived was via gun point taxes. Talk about arrogance and a closed mine. Thinking people could only be helped by pointing guns, sounds like a sick world. Exactly why it needs to be fixed. Pointing guns at people, that is the way to solve problems. Write a book. Guns pointing at people saves the world, it makes people nice and it makes them charitably, guns for all, point a gun at your neighbors head, and then he will be nice and give you things, all hale guns. Who needs Jesus, who needs ghandi, we have guns.
And now, this comment puzzles me the most. You have said it twice in this thread.
You keep saying fight back, or do something.
Chee, I think that is what I am doing by attempting here in the Free Speech forum to get people to see it my way.
I guess if one things the ONLY way is to be a politician what you say might make sense, but we have Libertarians running every year. We need votes, people vote. We need numbers, we need people to see what is wrong and what would be correct. That is what I am doing, I spend tons of time doing it. Why do you keep telling me to do something, I am, I am.
Why did I post a part of the Decl of Ind to you, because you wondered if I ever read it. You know, that sarcastic comment you made. Looks like you are more like me than you thought. I posted it to show you I have read it, and one of the parts I like most. Sorry you forgot that you wondered if I ever read it.
So now, let me be like I think Mike is.
Mike, are you going to show a clear trail of evidence leading to a near-irrefutable conclusion that your way is right?
Are you going to comment on the FDR's letter to General House?
Are you going to comment on FDR's son-in-law?