I am glad it wasn't really that high. I was getting nervous. Thank you for clarifying.turk wrote:The scientific authority has it at 391 ppm right now. So, lets say 390 out of 1,000,000. That is .00039, let's round it to .0004, which is .04% The IPCC says in its assessment, humans' CO2 is just around 5% of all that atmospheric CO2. So, 5%, or .05, of .04%, or .0004 equals .00002. Which is 2/100,000 of 1 percent. Okay?
Graphs like these are hard to reconcile as they compress the years into easily viewed images.
Suffice it to say that I wonder what kind of life is sustainable in the eras where the average temp is so much higher.
Will wheat grow? corn? beans? What kind of plants will grow. What kind of animals?
Average temps don't show the extremes. How high will the summer temps be? How low the winters?
If believable, it appears that CO2 hasn't been above 300ppm for the past 400 thousand years.
I really don't know what the answers are but it really does concern me that the earth as we know it, the earth (and it's biosphere) that birthed the life forms that we know, is showing a rapid change in it's make up
If we continue the trend of CO2 increases, how long will it take to increase the temps to a point of imbalance? Evolution takes time and speeding up the process can't be helpful.
Curiouser and curiouser.